FAQ
::
Szukaj
::
Użytkownicy
::
Grupy
::
Galerie
::
Profil
::
Zaloguj się, by sprawdzić wiadomości
::
Zaloguj
::
Rejestracja
Forum Stowarzyszenie "Rowling" Strona Główna
->
Ważne
Napisz odpowiedź
Użytkownik
Temat
Treść wiadomości
Emotikony
Więcej Ikon
Kolor:
Domyślny
Ciemnoczerwony
Czerwony
Pomarańćzowy
Brązowy
Żółty
Zielony
Oliwkowy
Błękitny
Niebieski
Ciemnoniebieski
Purpurowy
Fioletowy
Biały
Czarny
Rozmiar:
Minimalny
Mały
Normalny
Duży
Ogromny
Zamknij Tagi
Opcje
HTML:
TAK
BBCode
:
TAK
Uśmieszki:
TAK
Wyłącz HTML w tym poście
Wyłącz BBCode w tym poście
Wyłącz Uśmieszki w tym poście
Kod potwierdzający: *
Wszystkie czasy w strefie CET (Europa)
Skocz do:
Wybierz forum
Administracja
----------------
Tematyka forum
Ważne
Użytkownicy
----------------
Coś o nas
Nasza twórczość
Galeria
Rowling
----------------
Książki
Filmy
Serie, opowiadania
Inne
Inne
----------------
Kultura
Hyde park
Reklamy
Shoutbox
----------------
kilka informacji o shoutboxie
Przegląd tematu
Autor
Wiadomość
yan7s4t4
Wysłany: Sob 3:42, 21 Maj 2011
Temat postu: jordan 5 How Accurate Is Your Multimeter And What
ect Current (DC) namely linear. When we use a multimeter apt meter straight new, it namely what it is. However,jordan 5, the plot thickens while we are dealing with Alternating Current (AC). AC new voyages back and ahead down a conductor and tin best be depicted in graphical format. The maximum general graphical portrayal of AC current is a sine wag. Because the expanse of the sine wave continuously changes over the wag period (one complete cycle),jordan retro 1 Online Computer Repair-fix Your Com, by any given point in time, a current measurement would not be the same. Therefore, how do we accurately measure AC Current?
One method to measure AC current would be take current measurements at increments across one complete cycle and mean them together. This would give us an mean value of the current. If the current is a perfect sine wave, mathematically,cheap jordans, the average value is forever 0.636 times the value of the peak amplitude.
Another method to measure current is based ashore the current’s aptitude to perform go when applied to a resistive load. The laws of physics acquaint us that when current passes via a resistive load, it dissipates stamina in the form of heat, mechanical motion, radiation or additional forms of energy. If the resistive load is a heating unit and the resistive load stays constant, then the decrees of physics differentiate us that the heat produced is directly proportionate to the current passing through the load. Therefore, if we measure the heat, we ambition understand the current.
Mathematically, the relationship between heat and current is such that the heat produced is proportional to the square of the current applied to a resistance.
(Power or Heat) = (Current) ^2 * (Resistance)
If the current is continuously changing, as in AC current, the heat produced is proportional to the average (or mean) of the square of the current applied to a resistance:
(Power or Heat) = Average [ (Current) ^2 * (Resistance) ]
Using algebra, the above formula can be rewritten to read:
Current = Square Root [ (Power or Heat) / (Resistance) ]
AND this is called the Root Mean Square Current or RMS Current.
For AC currents that are graphically characterized by a sine wave, the RMS current will always be 0.707 times the peak current. With that said,jordan retro 1, we can calculate current by multiplying peak measurements by 0.707 if the current is a perfect sine wave. However, perfect sine waves are infrequent in most mercantile and industrial applications. This is for resistive loads in mercantile applications are not linear which results in unpredictable or variable current requirements.
In order to get a True RMS measurement, we can measure the heat dissipated by a constant resistive load and perform the above calculations. The result is a True RMS measurement.
Now that we got all the technical dispute out of the way, which is the best method to calculate current? Should we 1.) measure a current average 2.) multiply current peaks by 0.707 to obtain an RMS current, or 3.) measure the heat from a resistor and calculate a True RMS current value?
Although Global Test Supply sells multimeters namely can think current using any of the above methods, the most exactly course to calculate current in my attitude is a True RMS method. Average current values often are 40% less than True RMS values and that could average the difference among blown circuit breakers,jordan 5 Quick Terran Guide For Starcraft 2, malfunctioning motors,inexpensive jordans Computer Help And Optimization Is Your Computer Performance, or worst case, latent blaze risks. True RMS multimeters only price approximately 20-30% extra than the choice. How much is one exact current reading worth to you?
fora.pl
- załóż własne forum dyskusyjne za darmo
Powered by
phpBB
(C) 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
Theme Retred created by
JR9
for
stylerbb.net
Bearshare
Regulamin